Is Independent Television really a success? Some thoughts on iTV
Kris Van Nest's picture
I'm a performer (actor, dancer, etc)I'm adminI've been verified (another member, my site, etc)
Tue, 2006-10-03 09:22 2056 days ago


Interesting replies by regular Joes to an article on independent television (iTV) success. FYI, you don’t have to really know what “Diggnation” is about… disclaimer: it’s two guys litterally rambling about tech stuff and, as the comments indicate, sometimes even a bit drunk… yeah ok def not my cup o tea (even though i’m a big fan of tech), but that’s the beauty of it. It’s not actually meant to be “mainstream” stuff like regular broadcast or even cable is today. The populace seems to define iTV/narrowcasting as all about finding that niche audience, along with associated advertisers that match that niche (for those looking to recoup)… which seems to be upheld by the audience & ad $ revenue figures mentioned:

Well I thought the user comments, especially what radicaldementia, wisewaif, and mjh2901 say about niche, were pretty key for developing iTV stuff that independent artists might want to do. For instance, the Indie series content over at theburg.tv really doesn’t register w/ me (i’m thinking it’s simply an “I’m not from there” kinda thing)… but that doesn’t mean they don’t have a great thing going with their own niche audience and serious potential in their market. It’s not like the NBC et al model anymore that has to appeal to a country-wide demographic— who knows, maybe it’s not too crazy to have another niche show about Manhattanites (e.g., “theisland.tv”) or bridge-n-tunnel crowd (e.g., “bridgeandtunnel.tv”). I suppose there could eventually be an entire burg-like series about each of the ‘hoods that would appeal to audiences from there or to people w/ experienes from there. Wouldn’t make it on traditional broadcast or cable, but then mass market is often not the point (or joy) of iTV.

Anyway, good times to be indie (or isn’t it always?).


comments
comments...

bot's picture
Wed, 2006-10-04 11:53

Read more about iTV players, sources, and tools:



comments
comments...

Kris Van Nest's picture
Sun, 2006-10-15 16:59

IMO an example why traditional networks can still be relevant/get it:

Writing (did I mention the writing?), casting, directing… all comes together, and to top it off the “fake” SnL-like skits on Focus Group episode were ~10x better than real SnL skits I’ve seen (though I should mention I haven’t seen SnL in like 6-8months). And get this— network has apparently gotten the YouTube GooTube vibe because, at as of now, you can watch the full episode on-line at NBC link above (guess they wanna keep the advertising rev and viewer eyes in-house).



comments
comments...

Kris Van Nest's picture
Tue, 2006-11-07 07:28

from Splashcast….


Democratizing Airwaves with User-Generated TV Channels
November 3rd, 2006

I think Michael Arrington at Techcrunch is partially correct in his assertion that the convergence of TV across all devices (traditional TV, PCs, and mobile devices) is the real win in the IPTV race. But I think he is missing the bigger story.

We believe the promise of IPTV is not to create a more convenient television experience, it is to completely redefine what television is. IPTV can finally “democratize the airwaves” by leveling the play-field between the established media networks and user-generated channels.

Services like SplashCast will enable anyone to build their own media channel, broadcasting content they’ve either created or aggregated. As I stated in a previous post, you will be able to flip between NBC Nightly News, the Techcrunch channel (to watch their daily vodcast), the Justin Timberlake channel (to get footage of him eating breakfast at IHOP — paid for by IHOP), the Barack Obama channel (to get the latest scoop on his presidential ambitions), and your brother’s channel (where your 4-year-old nephew is the star).